Balancing
Anger, Hyperbole and Criticism By
Rodolfo
F. Acuña
Writing books and writing
blogs are similar. They should be truth. If they were not the author loses
credibility and his/her ability to convince suffers. This is how it should
be. But Arizona is testing this rule of thumb.
The assault on the truth in
Arizona makes it impossible for those seeking the truth to get traction, and
like Sisyphus; they fall into a rut with the boulder rolling back on them, at
every turn.
Because of the apparent
futility and ability to communicate, people become dispirited. Those who
continue to fight have to resort to hyperbole to get their message across. They
become so desperate that they want to emotionally shake up people to get their
attention.
A hyperbole is defined as an
exaggeration of fact, but in my experience this not necessarily true. The
speaker just wants to wake up people.
Hyperbole was used in the
1960s before the anti-war demonstrations when students were told that they were
exaggerating the truth. When people finally woke up thousands of
Americans, and hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese were dead.
The truth be told, a motivated
student mass stopped the use of nuclear weapons and the bombing of innocent
civilians. At home changes were brought about by politicized students, which
made possible the enrollment minorities into all white student campuses.
Students were interested in a
more just society, and they were attracted to groups that had a social purpose.
Consequently, the number of fraternities and sororities fell drastically on
college campuses.
American students, for a brief
time, became more like European and Latin American students who have
historically been politically and socially active.
One of the roles of students
was to act as champions of the underdog and confront tyranny. Because of
this, Latin American students were targeted by dictators.
The United States does not
have a tradition of student activism. And recent in times campus activism has
become an endangered species.