Katha
Pollitt | October 10, 2012
http://www.thenation.com/article/170494/year-woman
As
has been noted, the word "women" was not uttered
once
the whole evening in the prior debate.
But
women's rights and economic situation were not the
only
important issue inexplicably left out. Here are
some
questions I hope the next moderators will ask:
1.Poverty.
It's growing and deepening--some 46 million
people
and counting. But the way the economic debate is
framed,
you would think that every single person in
America
either owned a small business or was looking to
start
one, and the only question was how much they
should
be taxed and regulated. It's as if we think we
can
hardware-store our way into a whole new wave of
prosperity,
one newly hired shop assistant at a time.
Given
that wages even for full-time work can be so low
they
leave one eligible for food stamps, what role do
you
see for government in ensuring a decent life for
all?
2.Follow-up:
millions of children--almost one in
four--are
growing up poor. According to UNICEF, of the
thirty-five
richest countries, only Romania (!) has a
higher
rate of relative child poverty (kids at less
than
50 percent of median disposable income). Moreover,
the
United States does far less than other developed
countries
to ameliorate poverty and its effects. Canada
and
the United States, for example, start out with
roughly
equal percentages of kids in poverty, but
Canadian
government policies lift almost half of these
children
above the line. What is your program for
ending
child poverty in the next ten years?
Will these be in the debate?
No comments:
Post a Comment