The AFL-CIO
enlisted Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) to pen an op-ed opposing the
president's trade agenda, and the labor federation is recruiting more big names
to do the same. "We are making some headway in communicating to the
American public the destructive nature of Fast Track," reads an AFL-CIO
email solicitation. "We need your help. Could you write an opinion piece
or op ed column for a local newspaper or other publication explaining the
problems with Fast Track and opposing its passage?"
In response, the
president has "deployed cabinet officials, including Labor
Secretary Thomas Perez, Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker and U.S. Trade
Representative Michael Froman, who is leading the administration's effort, to
talk to Democrats,"
Rep. Charlie Rangel,
who backed several trade deals as Ways and Means chairman, said his party
should give Obama a chance even as it seeks to use its leverage to get
commitments from the administration on what will be included in the deals.
“It would seem to me that
instead of some Democrats saying, 'Hell no,' you'd try to tell the president
what you want,” Rangel told The Hill. “He hasn't even formally proposed
anything yet. ... But if they're against all trade? There's nothing to say.”
Obama has also deployed
Cabinet officials, including Labor Secretary Thomas Perez, Commerce Secretary
Penny Pritzker and U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman, who is leading the
administration’s effort, to talk to Democrats.
“The administration is
making a real concerted push on both sides of the Capitol — that's very clear,”
said one senior aide to a Democratic House member. “Now, can they push it over
the goal line? It's tough to say. Because there's another concerted opposition
effort that's just as vocal.”
The president's efforts
highlight the importance he places on making progress on trade. Obama has been
criticized by members of both parties at times for being too distant from
members and for not using a personal touch to win them over.
Opponents of fast-track,
including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), argue the trade deals under
discussion will hurt U.S. workers by putting them in direct competition with
low-wage workers overseas.
Warren has also argued
that including an international arbitration board to settle disputes under the
deals would give Wall Street an advantage. The boards are known as
investor-state dispute settlement boards.
“Does ISDS tilt the playing field in the
United States further in favor of big multinational corporations? No,”
officials said. “ISDS allows for neutral and transparent enforcement of a
limited and clearly specified set of basic rights and protections already
offered to U.S. and foreign investors alike under U.S. law.”
Obama and his senior
adviser, Valerie Jarrett, also recently met with International Brotherhood of
Teamsters leader James Hoffa and Communications Workers of America President
Larry Cohen.
“It was a frank
conversation,” said one source familiar with the meeting who disagrees with
Obama's trade pitch. “The bottom line was: We're not throwing out everything
else you've done — but we think this is way off.”
Obama will need some
number of Democrats to back both fast-track and the trade deals to win the
legislative battle, since the GOP is also divided on trade.
Officials on both sides of
debate are unsure how many Democrats Obama will need, but multiple sources put
the range at between 15 to 45 in the House.
Opponents say the White
House is getting more opposition than expected to what would be a rare legislative
victory in Obama’s second term.
“They're hitting more
resistance than they expected — not just from Democrats but from
Republicans," said Robert Reich, who served as Labor secretary under
former President Clinton and opposes Obama's trade pitch.
White House press
secretary Josh Earnest told reporters last week that Obama is “doing his best
to persuade as many Democrats as he can.”
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/235697-obama-courts-dems-on-trade
No comments:
Post a Comment