Sasha Abramsky. The Nation
There are three possible reasons
for Donald Trump’s depraved response to the Nazi violence unleashed in
Charlottesville on August 11–12. All are equally unnerving. The first is the
simplest: Trump is a morally senescent man, an emotional simpleton who just
does not have the capacity to tell right from wrong. That he could assert that
even some of the torch-bearing, Jew-and-black-and-gay-baiting thugs who
descended on Charlottesville during that weekend—shouting “Blood and soil!” and “Jews will not replace
us!”—were “very fine people” lends itself to this interpretation. That he could
consider Nazi and anti-Nazi motives to be morally equivalent implies damage to
a core part of his ethical being so profound as to be irreparable.
The second is that Trump—who rode
to power, as demagogues always do, by speaking to the worst impulses of his
audiences and embracing whatever nasty, violent visions were most politically
expedient at any given moment—is simply taking the opportunism game to a whole
new level. That certainly is possible; after all, Trump rode Islamophobia to victory in the GOP primaries and also helped to
fuel it. He played off voters’ fears about African-American and immigrant
criminality. He utilized crude, vulgar sexism against Hillary Clinton. He urged the US military to
carry out war crimes against terrorism suspects and their families: torture, collective punishment, summary execution using
bullets dipped in pigs’ blood, and so on. No politician in American history has
ever gone down so many different demagogic paths simultaneously and with so
much success.
So for Trump the demagogue, his
Charlottesville response may have been simply another political calculus, an
attempt to shore up his embittered white base. It is, I suppose,
possible—though the unhinged nature of Trump’s press conference seems to lower
the likelihood of this—that Trump himself knew the Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan
were entirely to blame for what unfolded, but saw far more political gain in
pandering to his angry followers by blaming blacks and radical leftists and the
other usual suspects regularly targeted by RantRadio and Fox TV.
The third possible reason is that
Donald Trump—the son of KKK-supporting Fred Trump, the pupil of Joe McCarthy henchman Roy Cohn—actually is, to the very core of his being, a white
supremacist, a man who always has and always will divide humanity into
hierarchies based on race, ethnicity, and religion. Trump’s almost pathological
inability to do what ought to be the simplest thing in American politics—issue
a clear, unambiguous, eyes-looking-straight-at-the-camera denunciation of
swastika-waving, weapons-toting Nazis—certainly raises this as a strong
possibility. He has certainly never needed Steve Bannon’s or any other
adviser’s encouragement to spout his bigoted obscenities. So Bannon’s recent ouster, however welcome, will not address the key problem
we’re facing.
Whichever combination of these
scenarios is correct, the implications are clear: Trump has no business
wielding power over anything or anyone—not over a business and its employees,
certainly not over a government department, and by no conceivable stretch of
the imagination over the most powerful country in the world. Trump’s words and
actions show that he is either deeply unstable, terrifyingly opportunistic,
and/or filled with the sort of hate that triggered previous world
conflagrations and all too easily could result today in a nuclear war or,
domestically, in a period of race riots and pogroms—or both.
It is far beyond time for men and
women of good conscience to denounce this president. And it is time to hold to
moral account all those who stay by this madman’s side while he threatens
nuclear apocalypse one day and encourages—or, at the very least, fails to
denounce—race-based violence the next.
Trump’s presidency is both a
symptom of the deep crises that have been cleaving American society for decades
and also a catalyst magnifying those crises. That a significant part of the US
electorate supports Trump not despite his racism but because of it ought to
terrify any responsible public figure. And yet, trapped in their own Faustian
bargain with extremism, GOP leaders have consistently shied away from tackling
Trump’s toxicity head-on. Even after he defended Nazis, most GOP figures didn’t
criticize Trump by name. This shouldn’t
surprise anyone; after all, for decades, the GOP—and, we must admit, large
parts of the Democratic Party—have played dog-whistle politics, advancing their
economic and cultural agendas by pandering to public fears around race and
playing the ostensibly nonracist, but in reality deeply discriminatory, “tough
on crime” and “tough on welfare” cards. The GOP leadership has, for many years
now, welcomed into its political house extremists from Jerry Falwell to Rush
Limbaugh to Sean Hannity.
Now those ideologues and their
audiences are running the show.
We must act immediately to
salvage whatever can be recovered from the wreckage of the political system
that Trump and his GOP enablers are destroying. America will not simply be able
to return to “normal”—whatever that vague term might mean—after Trump. In the
eyes of the world, we will have been radically diminished by this man’s
viciousness. But that sobering thought does not mean we don’t have an urgent
obligation to begin the cleanup as soon as possible. Trump is spreading a toxic
sludge over this great land. He is empowering bigots and normalizing political
violence. After Charlottesville, we must resist this man with every fiber of
our being.
Sasha AbramskySasha Abramsky, who writes regularly for The Nation,
is the author of several books, including Inside Obama’s Brain, Breadline
USA, American Furies, The American Way of Poverty,
No comments:
Post a Comment